* = first half winner
** = leads second half
| Team | Affiliate | W | L | PCT | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Division | |||||
| Hagerstown* | Nationals | 53 | 36 | 0.596 | -- |
| Greensboro** | Marlins | 51 | 38 | 0.573 | 2 |
| Delmarva | Orioles | 50 | 38 | 0.568 | 2.5 |
| Hickory | Rangers | 47 | 42 | 0.528 | 6 |
| West Virginia | Pirates | 44 | 44 | 0.500 | 8.5 |
| Lakewood | Phillies | 39 | 49 | 0.443 | 13.5 |
| Kannapolis | White Sox | 35 | 54 | 0.393 | 18 |
| Southern Division | |||||
| Charleston* | Yankees | 50 | 37 | 0.575 | -- |
| Augusta** | Giants | 48 | 41 | 0.539 | 3 |
| Greenville | Red Sox | 46 | 41 | 0.529 | 4 |
| Asheville | Rockies | 44 | 43 | 0.506 | 6 |
| Columbia | Mets | 41 | 48 | 0.461 | 10 |
| Rome | Braves | 36 | 52 | 0.409 | 14.5 |
| Lexington | Royals | 33 | 54 | 0.379 | 17 |
Now for the latest attendance in the South Atlantic League:
1. Greensboro 5,195
2. Lakewood 5,076
3. Greenville 4,845
4. Charleston 4,382
5. Lexington 4,028
6. Columbia 3,867
7. Delmarva 3,221
8. Asheville 2,594
9. Rome 2,571
10. Augusta 2,562
11. West Virginia 2,258
12. Hickory 2,214
13. Kannapolis 1,596
14. Hagerstown 1,191
The Fireflies have been doing pretty bad on the field lately, going 5-14 since Conlon and Siena were promoted at the start of the second half. So what's wrong? I think a lot of it lies in that the Mets in 2015 had no first round picks. Further more, the Mets' second, third, and fifth round picks are all high school players who still haven't gotten out of Rookie League yet. The only Mets draft pick out of a 4 year college in the first 6 rounds last year was David Thompson, who was promoted out of here a week ago. The good news is that the Mets were heavy in drafting college guys this June, which means we should see better and more experienced talent in Columbia very soon. Hopefully they won't do what they did with last year's 7th round pick in Corey Taylor in promoting them from Brooklyn to St, Lucie with no stop in Columbia.
So is this hurting our attendance right now? I think part of the reason that MiLB teams do stupid "stuff" (another s word might be more appropriate there) is that they have no control of how good there teams will be. The Fireflies have no power to get a better baseball team, only the Mets do and the Mets are going to do what is best for the Mets. I suppose the Fireflies could see if another SAL or Midwest League team would like to exchange affiliations, but that's a bit unlikely and probably wouldn't accomplish much. Usually affiliation changes are mostly driven by marketing on the part of the MLB team. Getting Brooklyn outfielder Gene Cone who played HS ball less than 10 miles from Spirit Communications Park and college ball for a very popular team less than 5 miles away should be a boost for getting community support. Now if the Mets decide to send Cone to St. Lucie instead, maybe the Fireflies would have a grievance for changing affiliations.
At some point, I am going to need to do a correlation study on what drives attendance rankings. What is most important? Winning? How new the stadium is? Market size? My feeling is that in the majors, winning is most important but it might be winning from the previous year rather than right now due to season ticket sales.My feeling is that stadium newness is probably the driving factor in the high minors while market size drives attendance in the low minors. But what defines market size? And can some markets be too big if they have competing entertainment options? I will have to look at that with either a future attendance report or a Sunday feature.
No comments:
Post a Comment